Chief Justice Woo In-seong: Who is he? ⚖️
1. 🔍 The ultimate in meticulousness: “You have to see it for yourself to know.”
hello Daily Life It is! 👋 Many of you were surprised when you saw the news yesterday, right? It's not even a current job. Former President and his wifeAll of them are real... It really feels like a page in history is turning.
Who on earth made such a huge decision? Chief Judge Woo In-seong, I was curious about who he was, so I compiled everything! 🧐
The most notable characteristic of Judge Woo In-seong is Microscopic verification This is it. Usually, judges only make decisions based on documents, but this person is different.
“Bring me a shopping bag and see if it really holds 100 million won.” 🛍️💸
It is said that he actually brought bundles of money and shopping bags to the court and personally put them in, and even checked to see if the buckle of a luxury bag was scratched by shining a smartphone flashlight on it. I don't believe it without proof“He is a person with very clear rules.
2. ⚖️ The principle of “following the law” with no exceptions even for the strong
The core of this ruling is process It was. Judge Woo said this in his ruling.
“The application of the law should be without discrimination between those in power and those without power.” 🚫👑
Many people ask, "Why is stock manipulation not guilty, but only bribery is guilty?" Let me explain in a way even an elementary school student can understand!
- Stock manipulation (Deutsche Motors): “It is suspicious, but I heard that he directly participated in the operation. Solid evidence (recordings, instructions) ”There is a lack of.” 👉 innocence
- Acceptance of bribes (luxury bags, etc.): “There is clear evidence of receipt of the item, and this is not a simple gift, but rather a request (request) in return.” 👉 Guilty (1 year and 8 months in prison)
in other words, There is circumstantial evidence, but no punishment can be imposed without evidence.”" He strictly adhered to the fundamental principles of criminal trials.
3. 🌈 A look at minorities and the weak
“If you ask, ”Then are you just too cold-hearted?” NO! 🙅♂️
Looking at past rulings human rights sensitivityIt is also quite high.
- Ssangyong Motors dismissed workers found not guilty: “If the public authority (police) suppressed the protests too excessively, the workers” resistance was justified.”
- Transgender Gender Correction Permission: “Even if you haven’t had surgery, your sexual identity should be respected.” (This was truly groundbreaking in the legal world at the time!)
In summary, rather than leaning towards either conservative or progressive, Protect the rights of the weak, but verify the facts of crime under a microscope. I guess you could say it's a style. 🕵️♂️
4. 🏁 Conclusion
In the end, Chief Justice Woo In-seong is more concerned with public opinion or political sentiment than anything else. Evidence before my eyes and '‘Legal doctrine‘' is the top priority Orthodox judgeYou could say that. 3040 office workers, if you meet a boss who only competes with “facts” at work, it might be tiring, but it won’t be unfair, right? 😉
Three-line summary:
- The meticulousness itself is so great that luxury bags and wads of money are directly verified in court!
- “A principled person who believes that ”if there is no evidence, there is no guilt, if there is evidence, there is no guilt.”.
- He is warm to the weak, but has a tendency to make harsh judgments when it comes to corruption among those in power.